WEB-EXCLUSIVE COMMENT The new price of hunger BAN KI-MOON Special to Globe and Mail Update March 13, 2008 at 1:47 AM EDT 세계시장에서 곡물 가격이 계속 천정 부지로 뛰고 있읍니다. 기아와 영양실조의 위협 또한 늘어나고 있읍니다. 이 지구상에서 가장 배고픔에 굶주리는 사람들의 위험이 최고에 달했읍니다. 시급한 대책이 필요한 때입니다. 지난 2000년대에 유엔산하의 정상들이 새천년 회의를 했을때, 2015년까지 굶주림을 절반으로 줄이기위한 목적에서 열렸읍니다. 이계획은 벌써 난관에 부딪치고 있읍니다. 아프리카의 여러나라들이 그 속에 있읍니다. 많은 나라들이 최저 생활기준에서 훨씬 뒤 떨어진, 아프리카에서는 더 심각합니다. 이러한 감당키 어려운 많은 시련들에 우리 인류는 직면해 있읍니다. 기본 식량-밀, 옥수수, 쌀-의 가격이 지난 6개월 동안에 최소 50% 또는 그이상 폭등했읍니다. 지구상의 식량 재고는 역사상 유례가 없이 바닥을 치고 있읍니다. 이러한 원인은 지금 한창 경제적 붐을 이루고 있는 인도와 중국의 수요가 증가하고, 또 태풍, 홍수 또는 가뭄등의 기후 변화가 세계 각곳에서 수확량을 감소 시키거나, 파괴해 버린 결과 입니다. 천정 부지로 오르고 있는 유가는 식량의 수송비용과 비료구매에 따른 원가 인상을 부추겼고, 어떤 전문가들은 말하기를 Biofuels의 사용 증가로 인류가 먹을수 있는 식량생산이 감소 됐다고 주장합니다. 이러한 증가는 여러곳에서 보입니다. 식량폭동이 동남아시아와 서부 아프리카에서 일어나고 있읍니다. 식량을 수입해서 굶는 사람들을 먹여 살리는 지역에서는 생활비의 폭등에 항의가 끝이지 않고 있읍니다. 치안이 약한 지역에서는 식량공급의 불안에 위협을 더 느끼고 있읍니다. 많은 정부들이 식량수출과 규제를 강화하여 시장질서를 어지럽히고, 이것은 시장구조의 유통에 큰 시련이 되고 있읍니다. 아래 원문을 계속 보시면 더 자세한 내용을 볼수 있읍니다. The price of food is soaring. The threat of hunger and malnutrition is growing. Millions of the world's most vulnerable people are at risk. An effective and urgent response is needed. The first of the Millennium Development Goals, set by world leaders at the United Nations summit in 2000, aims to reduce the proportion of hungry people by half by 2015. This was already a major challenge, not least in Africa, where many countries have fallen behind. But we now face a perfect storm of new challenges. The prices of basic staples ― wheat, corn, rice ― are at record highs, up 50 per cent or more in the last six months. Global food stocks are at historic lows. The causes range from rising demand in major economies such as India and China to climate- and weather-related events such as hurricanes, floods and droughts that have devastated harvests in many parts of the world. High oil prices have increased the cost of transporting food and purchasing fertilizer. Some experts say the rise of biofuels has reduced the amount of food available for humans. The effects are widely seen. Food riots have erupted in countries from West Africa to South Asia. Communities living in countries where food has to be imported to feed hungry populations are rising up to protest the high cost of living. Fragile democracies are feeling the pressure of food insecurity. Many governments have issued export bans and price controls on food, distorting markets and presenting challenges to commerce. In January, to cite but one example, Afghan President Hamid Karzai appealed for $77-million (U.S.) to help feed more than 2.5 million people pushed over the edge by rising prices. In doing so, he drew attention to an alarming fact: The average Afghan household now spends about 45 per cent of its income on food, compared with 11 per cent in 2006. This is the new face of hunger, increasingly affecting communities that had previously been protected. And, inevitably, it is the so-called "bottom billion" who are hit hardest: people living on $1 or less a day. When people are that poor and inflation erodes their meagre earnings, they generally do one of two things: They buy less food or they buy cheaper, less nutritious food. The end result is the same ― more hunger and less chance of a healthy future. The UN's World Food Program is seeing families who previously could afford a diverse, nutritious diet dropping to one staple and cutting their meals from three to two or one a day. Experts believe that high food prices may be here to stay. Even so, we have the tools and technology to beat hunger and meet the goals of the millennium goals. We know what to do ― what's required is political will and resources, directed effectively and efficiently. First, we must meet urgent humanitarian needs. This year, WFP plans to feed 73 million people globally, including as many as three million people a day in Darfur. But to do so, the WFP requires an additional $500-million simply to cover the rise in food costs. (Note that 80 per cent of the agency's purchases are made in the developing world.) Second, we must strengthen UN programs to help developing countries deal with hunger. This must include support for safety-net programs to provide social protection, in the face of urgent need, while working on longer-term solutions. We also need to develop early warning systems to reduce the impact of disasters. School feeding, at a cost of less than 25 cents a day, can be a particularly powerful tool. Third, we must deal with the increasing consequences of weather-related shocks to local agriculture, as well as the long-term consequences of climate change ― for example, by building drought and flood defence systems that can help food-insecure communities to cope and adapt. Finally, we must boost agricultural production. World Bank president Robert Zoellick rightly notes there is no reason why Africa can't experience a "green revolution" of the sort that transformed Southeast Asia in previous decades. UN agencies such as the Food and Agriculture Organization and the International Fund for Agricultural Development are working with the African Union and others to do just this, introducing vital science and technologies that offer permanent solutions for hunger. Simply improving market efficiency can have a huge effect. Roughly a third of the world's food shortages could, to a significant degree, be alleviated by improving local agricultural distribution networks and helping to better connect small farmers to markets. But that is for the future. In the here and now, we must help the world's hungry hit by rising food prices. That means, for starters, recognizing the urgency of the crisis ― and acting. Ban Ki-moon is Secretary-General of the United Nations.